Meditations 2.11.4 · 2.11.4

This is the Stoic doctrine of the ἀδιάφορα, the "indifferents," stated in its bluntest form. Marcus lists four canonical pairs — death and life, reputation and disrepute, toil and pleasure, wealth and poverty — and grounds the whole argument in an empirical claim: these things συμβαίνει, "fall out" or "befall," on good and bad people without discrimination. If they were genuine goods and evils, they would track moral character; instead the same lot befalls a Socrates and a tyrant alike. The conclusion, "neither noble nor base," is therefore reasoned to rather than merely announced — a small but telling instance of how Marcus works through a doctrine instead of just reciting it.

The closing sentence tightens the logic with ἄρα, "then" or "therefore," marking "neither good nor bad" as an inference from what precedes rather than a restatement of it. The position is orthodox early Stoicism, close to what Epictetus sets at the head of his own Encheiridion — some things are up to us, some are not, and only the former admit of good and bad. Marcus's interest here, as through the rest of Book 2, is less taxonomic than practical: if these externals carry no moral weight in themselves, the weight falls entirely on how the ἡγεμονικόν, the ruling faculty, meets them — the same point he returns to at length in Book 4, where a rational being's good is said to lie in what it does with its own nature, not in what merely happens to it.

Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.

You are reading a page of the Meditations — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.

The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.

Also on our shelves:

• Plato's Phaedrus — complete, ancient Greek
• Heraclitus, the Fragments — complete
• Dante's Inferno — Italian, canto I
• Dom Casmurro — Brazilian Portuguese