The trained eye finds beauty in what merely happens
Read the full text in our reader
ὥστε, εἴ τις ἔχει πάθος καὶ ἔννοιαν βαθυτέραν πρὸς τὰ ἐν τῷ ὅλῳ γινόμενα, σχεδὸν οὐδὲν οὐχὶ δόξει αὐτῷ καὶ τῶν κατ’ ἐπακολούθησιν συμβαινόντων ἡδέως πως διασυνίστασθαι. οὗτος δὲ καὶ θηρίων ἀληθῆ χάσματα οὐχ ἧσσον ἡδέως ὄψεται ἢ ὅσα γραφεῖς καὶ πλάσται μιμούμενοι δεικνύουσιν, καὶ γραὸς καὶ γέροντος ἀκμήν τινα καὶ ὥραν καὶ τὸ ἐν παισὶν ἐπαφρόδιτον τοῖς ἑαυτοῦ σώφροσιν ὀφθαλμοῖς ὁρᾶν δυνήσεται· καὶ πολλὰ τοιαῦτα οὐ παντὶ πιθανά, μόνῳ δὲ τῷ πρὸς τὴν φύσιν καὶ τὰ ταύτης ἔργα γνησίως ᾠκειωμένῳ προσπεσεῖται.
So if a person has real feeling and a deeper insight into what happens within the Whole, almost nothing — not even among the things that follow as mere consequence — will fail to seem to him to fit together pleasantly, somehow. Such a man will look with no less delight on the actual gaping jaws of wild beasts than on what painters and sculptors show in imitating them, and with his own sober eyes he will be able to see a certain bloom and ripeness in old women and old men, and the charm that graces children. Many such things are not persuasive to everyone — they strike home only for the one who is genuinely attuned to nature and to nature's own works.
Continuing 3.2's catalogue of nature's incidental beauties (foam on a boar's mouth, bent ears of grain), Marcus pushes the claim to its hardest case — a beast's bared jaws, an old face — arguing that only a mind truly at home with Nature perceives such things as lovely.
This sentence completes the aesthetic argument begun earlier in Book 3.2: a mind trained to see the workings of the Whole finds beauty not only in nature's deliberate ornaments — the ripe ear of grain, the froth on a boar's mouth — but even in a wild animal's bared and gaping jaws, an image with no obvious loveliness at all. Marcus deliberately raises the stakes by comparing the raw thing to its imitation: if painters and sculptors already succeed in making such sights pleasing when they copy them, why should the real thing please any less? The comparison collapses the usual gap between art and nature — both, rightly seen, are instances of one underlying order, and the philosopher's eye, unlike the untrained one, needs no artist's mediation to enjoy what it sees.
The clinching move is the final clause: this pleasure is available only to the one who is "genuinely" (γνησίως) ᾠκειωμένῳ — made-at-home with, appropriated to, nature and her works. The verb οἰκειόω carries the technical weight of Stoic οἰκείωσις, the process by which a rational being comes to recognize what properly belongs to it; here Marcus extends that process from ethics into aesthetics, making love of nature a condition for perceiving nature's beauty at all. The claim echoes the willing acceptance of nature urged at 2.3 and 4.23, and anticipates 6.36's observation that whatever follows from nature's own processes is never without its own comeliness. The old woman's or old man's "bloom" (ἀκμή) and "ripeness" (ὥρα) sit deliberately beside the child's charm — decline set on equal footing with youth, both legible as instances of one natural unfolding, but only to an eye that has made that unfolding its own.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Meditations 3.2.3 in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Meditations — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Meditations 3.2.3 — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/meditations-greek/3.2.3/