The Beautiful Needs No Praise
Read the full text in our reader
Πᾶν τὸ καὶ ὁπωσοῦν καλὸν ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ καλόν ἐστι καὶ ἐφ’ ἑαυτὸ καταλήγει, οὐκ ἔχον μέρος ἑαυτοῦ τὸν ἔπαινον· οὔτε γοῦν χεῖρον ἣ κρεῖττον γίνεται τὸ ἐπαινούμενον. τοῦτό φημι καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν κοινότερον καλῶν λεγομένων, οἷον ἐπὶ τῶν ὑλικῶν καὶ ἐπὶ τῶν τεχνικῶν κατασκευασμάτων ( τὸ γὰρ δὴ ὄντως καλὸν τίνος χρείαν ἔχει; οὐ μᾶλλον ἣ νόμος, οὐ μᾶλλον ἣ ἀλήθεια, οὐ μᾶλλον ἢ εὔνοια ἢ αἰδώς)· τί τούτων διὰ τὸ ἐπαινεῖσθαι καλόν ἐστιν ἢ ψεγόμενον φθείρεται; σμαράγδιον γὰρ ἑαυτοῦ χεῖρον γίνεται, ἐὰν μὴ ἐπαινῆται; τί δὲ χρυσός, ἐλέφας, πορφύρα, λύρα, μαχαίριον, ἀνθύλλιον, δενδρύφιον;
Everything that is beautiful in any way at all is beautiful of itself and terminates in itself, not having praise as a part of itself; for what is praised becomes neither worse nor better. I say this also of the things more commonly called beautiful — material things and works of craft. (For what need has the truly beautiful? None — no more than law, no more than truth, no more than kindliness or self-respect.) Which of these is beautiful because it is praised, or is ruined by being blamed? Does an emerald become worse than it was if it is not praised? And what of gold, ivory, purple, a lyre, a little knife, a flower, a shrub?
Whatever is beautiful is beautiful of itself and complete in itself; praise adds nothing and blame takes nothing away. This holds even of an emerald, gold, or a flower — and all the more of law, truth, and goodwill.
Marcus makes a clean philosophical point about the self-sufficiency of the beautiful. Anything genuinely καλόν — a word that in Greek fuses "beautiful" and "morally fine" — is beautiful ἐξ ἑαυτοῦ, out of itself, and "terminates in itself" (ἐφ᾽ ἑαυτὸ καταλήγει): its worth is complete and self-contained, not something conferred from outside. Praise, therefore, is not "a part" of the beautiful thing at all, and the proof is decisive: what is praised becomes neither better nor worse for it. Approval and blame slide off; they touch reputation, never the reality.
The examples run deliberately from the humble to the exalted and back, to show the principle is universal. An emerald is no worse an emerald unpraised; gold, ivory, purple, a lyre, a knife, a flower, a shrub — each is exactly what it is whether admired or not. And Marcus slips in the higher cases as the real target: law, truth, εὔνοια (goodwill), αἰδώς (the sense of honour) need applause even less than a gemstone does. The moral he leaves the reader to draw: if a mere stone owes nothing to praise, how much less should a human excellence, or a good action, look to it. This is the metaphysical foundation under his repeated attacks on the love of fame (4.19) — the beautiful is autonomous, and to chase praise is to misunderstand what beauty and goodness even are.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Meditations 4.20 in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Meditations — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Meditations 4.20 — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/meditations-greek/4.20/