When Appetite Takes the Throne
Read the full text in our reader
Socrates — ἐπιθυμίας δὲ ἀλόγως ἑλκούσης ἐπὶ ἡδονὰς καὶ ἀρξάσης ἐν ἡμῖν τῇ ἀρχῇ ὕβρις ἐπωνομάσθη.
But when desire, dragging us without reason toward pleasures, has seized command within us, the name given to its rule is hubris.
Still building his cool analysis of love, Socrates names the state that results when the soul's lower ruler wins — the raw appetite for pleasure seizing command over judgment.
Socrates is finishing the psychology he began at 237d, where he set two rulers in every soul: an innate appetite for pleasure and an acquired judgment aiming at the best. Now he names the outcome when the wrong one wins. When appetite (<em>epithymía</em>) 'takes command' (<em>arxásēs</em>) and its 'rule' (<em>archê</em>) governs us, that tyranny is called <em>hýbris</em>. The word-play is exact and untranslatable: <em>archê</em> means both 'beginning' and 'rule,' so appetite doesn't merely start something — it <em>reigns</em>, and reigns illegitimately, a usurper on the soul's throne. And the verb for how it moves us is <em>hélkō</em>, 'to drag' — not to persuade but to haul by force, <em>alógōs</em>, 'without <em>lógos</em>,' outside all reason and speech. The appetitive soul is the part reason cannot argue with, only rein; this is the deaf dark horse of the palinode (253e) seen from the sober side, before the myth transfigures it.<br><br>What makes the passage quietly remarkable is that this is the speech Socrates will <em>recant</em>. The analysis here is not wrong — Plato holds the same tripartite psychology in the <em>Republic</em>, where appetite tyrannizing over reason is exactly the diseased soul — but it is <em>incomplete</em>, because it treats all overmastering desire as <em>hýbris</em>, mere disorder. The palinode's whole reversal will be to distinguish two ways the rational ruler can be overthrown: from <em>below</em>, by appetite (this is <em>hýbris</em>, and it is bad), and from <em>above</em>, by a god-sent madness at the sight of Beauty (this is the divine mania, and it is the greatest good). The first speech can only see the downward overthrow; it lacks the concept of being seized from above. That blindness is precisely the 'offense against the divine' the daimonion will punish at the ford — and to supply the missing half is why the palinode has to be sung.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Phaedrus 238a in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Phaedrus — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Phaedrus 238a — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/phaedrus/238a/