Medicine of the Soul
Read the full text in our reader
Socrates — ὁ αὐτός τρόπος ἰατρικῆς ῥητορικῆς… δεῖ διελέσθαι φύσιν σώματος ψυχῆς… μὴ τριβῇ ἐμπειρίᾳ ἀλλὰ τέχνῃ… λόγους πειθὼ ἀρετὴν.
Here Socrates lays down the foundation stone of his whole theory of true rhetoric, and it is one of the most fertile analogies in the history of thought: rhetoric is to the soul what medicine is to the body. 'The method of the medical art is the same,' he says, 'as that of rhetoric.' In each, 'you must analyze a nature,' dielesthai physin — divide it, by the dialectical method, into its kinds and parts — the nature of the body for the doctor, the nature of the soul for the orator. And in each this must be done 'not by routine and experience alone,' mē tribēi kai empeiriāi, 'but by art,' technēi — that is, from knowledge of causes, not mere hands-on familiarity. Then the parallel completes itself with precision. The doctor works on the body by 'applying drugs and diet,' pharmaka kai trophēn, to produce 'health and strength.' The orator works on the soul by 'applying speeches and lawful practices,' logous kai epitēdeuseis nomimous, to produce 'whatever persuasion and virtue you wish,' peithō kai aretēn. Speech is to the soul what medicine is to the body; and just as the doctor cannot heal without knowing the body's nature, the orator cannot truly persuade without knowing the soul's.
Socrates states the great analogy that grounds his whole positive theory of rhetoric. The method of the medical art, he says, is the same as that of rhetoric. In both you must analyze a nature — the nature of the body in the one case, of the soul in the other — if you mean to proceed by real art and not by mere routine and knack: to the body applying drugs and diet to produce health and strength; to the soul applying speeches and disciplined practices, to impart whatever persuasion and virtue you wish.
This analogy is the constructive heart of the Phaedrus, and everything the dialogue has built converges on it. Recall the long argument: the handbooks failed because they mistook preliminaries for the art, and they did so because they could not define their subject, and they could not define it because they lacked dialectic. Now Socrates shows what the missing art actually is, and it is modeled exactly on medicine, Plato's favorite example of a genuine technē. The doctor is a real artist, not a peddler of remedies, because he does two things the pretender cannot: he knows the nature of the body — its kinds, its parts, its states — by a systematic analysis, and from that knowledge he judges which treatment fits which patient, when, and how much. Transpose this to rhetoric and you have Plato's entire positive doctrine in embryo. The true orator must know the nature of the soul as the doctor knows the nature of the body — must analyze it, divide it into its kinds, understand what moves each kind — and from that knowledge judge which speech to apply to which soul, on which occasion, to what degree. Rhetoric, so understood, is a science of the soul and its treatment by speech: psychagōgia, soul-leading, resting on a real psychology as medicine rests on physiology. Three things in the passage repay special attention. First, the word for the required knowledge is 'analyze a nature,' dielesthai physin — division, diairesis, the dialectical method named earlier, now applied to the soul. The whole apparatus of collection and division exists, it turns out, precisely so that the orator can map the kinds of soul. Second, the contrast 'not by routine and experience but by art' draws the exact line the Gorgias drew between rhetoric-as-knack and rhetoric-as-art: empeiria and tribē give you the pastry-chef, technē gives you the physician. And third, and most striking, the goal of the soul's treatment is named as 'persuasion and virtue,' peithō kai aretē. The orator does not merely produce belief; at his highest he produces virtue — health of soul, the analogue of the body's health and strength. This is the moral heart of the whole redemption of rhetoric. The sophists' rhetoric aimed only at peithō, persuasion, and was indifferent to whether it healed or harmed the soul it worked on. Plato's true rhetoric aims at the soul's health, and its persuasions are like a doctor's treatments — administered from knowledge, for the good of the patient. The demagogue drugs the soul for his own ends; the philosophical orator heals it. And the analogy carries a sober warning within its hope, for the same knowledge that lets a doctor heal lets him poison. A rhetoric powerful enough to impart virtue is powerful enough to corrupt; which is exactly why Plato insists it be grounded not just in knowledge of the soul but in knowledge of the truth and the good. The physician of souls, like the physician of bodies, is defined by the end he serves. Everything remaining in the dialogue — the detailed program of dividing souls and speeches, the critique of writing — unfolds from this single, luminous comparison: to speak truly well is to be a healer of souls.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Phaedrus 270b in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Phaedrus — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Phaedrus 270b — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/phaedrus/270b/