The Orphaned Speech Cannot Defend Itself
Read the full text in our reader
Socrates — … κυλινδεῖται μὲν πανταχοῦ πᾶς λόγος ὁμοίως παρὰ τοῖς ἐπαΐουσιν,… παρʼ οἷς οὐδὲν προσήκει, καὶ οὐκ ἐπίσταται λέγειν οἷς δεῖ… καὶ μή.… τοῦ πατρὸς ἀεὶ δεῖται βοηθοῦ· αὐτὸς γὰρ οὔτʼ ἀμύνασθαι οὔτε βοηθῆσαι δυνατὸς αὑτῷ.
Phaedrus — καὶ ταῦτά σοι ὀρθότατα εἴρηται.
This is the passage that fixed, for the whole Western tradition, the charge against the written word. Once a speech is written down, Socrates says, it 'rolls about everywhere' (kylindeitai pantachou), landing indiscriminately in the hands of those who understand and those to whom it means nothing, because it cannot pick its audience: it does not know to whom it ought to speak and to whom it ought to keep silent. And when it is misread or unjustly abused, it 'always needs its father to help it,' tou patros aei deitai boēthou — the author must come running to its defense — for the text 'by itself can neither ward off attack nor come to its own rescue,' out' amynasthai oute boēthēsai dynatos hautōi. Phaedrus agrees: that too has been most rightly said.
Socrates completes the indictment of writing with its most famous image. A written speech is like a painting: it looks alive but says only one same thing when questioned. Worse, once written it drifts everywhere, unable to choose its readers, and when abused it cannot answer back — it always needs its 'father,' the author, to come to its rescue.
The governing metaphor is kinship, and it runs deeper than a single simile. A few lines earlier writing was compared to <em>zōgraphia</em>, painting — figures that stand there 'as if alive' but fall silent the moment you question them (275d). Here the image shifts from picture to <em>child</em>: the written speech is the offspring of a <em>patēr</em>, a father, and like a child abandoned in the world it cannot fend for itself, cannot choose its company, cannot answer when attacked. The single word <em>boēthos</em> carries the whole pathos — it means a helper, but literally 'one who runs at the war-cry,' βοή + θέω, someone sprinting toward an alarm. The orphaned text raises a cry it cannot answer; only the absent father can run to it, and he is not there. This is the precise vulnerability that a living conversation does not have: spoken dialectic can defend itself, clarify, meet the objection, say a second and different thing to a second and different questioner. Writing says, as the previous line put it, 'one and the same thing forever.' There is a famous and deliberate irony threaded through all of this, and Plato wants the reader to feel it: he is delivering, in writing, the most influential argument ever made against writing, and staging it as reported speech — Socrates, who wrote nothing, quoting an Egyptian king, inside a dialogue Plato wrote. The next movement turns the metaphor to constructive use: the true 'legitimate brother' of the dead written word is the <em>living</em> speech written 'in the soul of the learner' (276a), which can defend itself and knows before whom to speak and before whom to be silent — the very things the orphan cannot do.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Phaedrus 275e in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Phaedrus — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Phaedrus 275e — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/phaedrus/275e/