Disgraceful in Truth, Though the Crowd Applaud
Read the full text in our reader
Socrates — … καὶ ἀδίκων πέρι καὶ κακῶν καὶ ἀγαθῶν οὐκ ἐκφεύγει τῇ ἀληθείᾳ μὴ οὐκ ἐπονείδιστον εἶναι, οὐδὲ ἂν ὁ πᾶς ὄχλος αὐτὸ ἐπαινέσῃ.
Phaedrus — οὐ γὰρ οὖν.
The sentence begun in 277d closes with its sharpest edge. To be ignorant of the just, the bad, and the good — 'waking and dreaming,' the previous line said — and yet to write as though one's text were certain and clear, 'does not escape, in truth (tē alētheia), from being disgraceful,' ouk ekpheugei … mē ouk eponeidiston einai, 'not even if the whole crowd should praise it,' oud' an ho pas ochlos auto epainesē. The disgrace is not a matter of how the writing is received. It is fixed in the nature of the case, in the truth of the thing, and no volume of applause can dislodge it. Phaedrus answers with a bare 'No indeed.'
Socrates finishes the thought: to be ignorant of what is just, bad, and good, and yet to write as if one's text held certainty, cannot escape being genuinely disgraceful. The shame is lodged in the truth of the matter, not in anyone's verdict — not even if the whole crowd should cheer. Phaedrus agrees flatly.
The whole force of the sentence lands on one opposition: <em>hē alētheia</em> against <em>ho pas ochlos</em> — the truth against the whole crowd. Shame, Socrates says, is real 'in truth,' and the loudest acclamation of the mob cannot make a disgraceful thing honorable. This is not a stray aside; it is the ethical bedrock the entire critique of writing has been resting on, stated at last in the open. It is the same conviction that drives the <em>Gorgias</em> — that it is worse to do wrong than to suffer it, and that the orator who wins the assembly's roar while ignorant of justice has gained nothing real — and the same one Socrates presses in the <em>Crito</em>, where he insists we must heed not the opinion of the many but the one who knows, because on questions of right and wrong there is a truth that popularity cannot touch. Set against the <em>ochlos</em>, the crowd whose applause the sophists and speech-writers chased, it quietly indicts the entire culture of persuasion the dialogue has been examining: a speech can carry the whole theater and still be a disgrace, if the man who made it does not know what he is talking about. There is also a small grammatical intensity worth catching. Greek piles up the negatives here — <em>ekpheugei mē ouk eponeidiston</em>, literally 'does not escape not being not-disgraceful' — a redundant doubling the language uses after verbs of hindering and escaping, which does not cancel out but reinforces: there is no way out, no loophole, the shame cannot be evaded. The syntax itself closes every exit, which is exactly the point: ignorance of justice, dressed up in confident writing and cheered by a crowd, is trapped in its own disgrace.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Phaedrus 277e in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Phaedrus — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Phaedrus 277e — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/phaedrus/277e/