Written in the Soul: Clear, Complete, Worth Earnest
Read the full text in our reader
Socrates — … ἐν δὲ τοῖς διδασκομένοις καὶ μαθήσεως χάριν λεγομένοις καὶ τῷ ὄντι γραφομένοις ἐν ψυχῇ περὶ δικαίων τε καὶ καλῶν καὶ ἀγαθῶν ἐν μόνοις ἡγούμενος τό τε ἐναργὲς εἶναι καὶ τέλεον καὶ ἄξιον σπουδῆς.
Here the positive doctrine is stated in full. The written page, Socrates has said, is at best a hypomnēsis, a reminder for those who already know. But there is a wholly other kind of word: the words 'that are taught, and spoken for the sake of learning (mathēseōs charin), and truly written in the soul (tō onti graphomenois en psychē) about things just and beautiful and good.' In these alone, he holds, is 'the clear and the complete and the worthy-of-earnest,' to enarges … kai teleon kai axion spoudēs. The three predicates are exactly what the dead letter lacked: enarges, self-evidently clear rather than merely legible; teleon, complete rather than a fragment that says one same thing; axion spoudēs, worth being serious about rather than mere play. And the deepest paradox of the dialogue is compressed into the phrase 'written in the soul': the only true writing is the kind that uses no ink at all.
Socrates draws the contrast to its point. The written page is at best a reminder; but there is another kind of word — taught, spoken to make someone learn, and 'truly written in the soul' about what is just, beautiful, and good. In these alone, he says, lies what is genuinely clear and complete and worth being in earnest about.
The governing image is one Socrates set down a few pages earlier and now completes: the living word is 'written in the soul of the learner' (276a), and it is called the 'legitimate brother' of the mute thing on the page — of which the written word is only an <em>eidōlon</em>, an image or ghost. Here that living inscription is given its three marks, and each is chosen to answer a defect of the page. <em>Enarges</em> is the strongest of them and the most surprising: in Homer and in cult it is the word for a god appearing 'in the flesh,' manifest and unmistakable, and Plato lets that force carry over — a truth alive in the soul is not just readable but self-showing, present the way a visible thing is present, where the written mark only points from a distance. <em>Teleon</em> answers the complaint that writing 'says one and the same thing forever': the word in the soul is whole, finished, able to unfold and respond, brought all the way to its <em>telos</em>. And <em>axion spoudēs</em>, 'worth earnest,' completes the play/seriousness pair that has run through this last movement: the page is <em>paidia</em>, play; only the soul's word deserves <em>spoudē</em>. The paradox at the center is deliberate and never resolved into a slogan. Plato has spent the dialogue writing, in ink, that the truth cannot be written in ink — and here he names the alternative not as speechlessness but as a different <em>graphē</em>, a writing in the living medium of the mind. It is the same thought he trusts to the Seventh Letter, where he says the real object of his seriousness is not sayable or writable like other things, but leaps up, 'like light kindled from a leaping flame,' only when two souls have worked at it together. The written dialogue is at most a spark thrown toward that flame — and it knows, and says, that it is only a spark.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Phaedrus 278a in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Phaedrus — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Phaedrus 278a — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/phaedrus/278a/