Donkeys would choose chaff over gold
Read the full text in our reader
… ὄνους σύρματ᾽ ἂν ἑλέσθαι ἢ χρυσόν
Donkeys would choose refuse rather than gold.
Preserved by Aristotle in the Nicomachean Ethics (10.5), quoted for the relativity of pleasure — different creatures delight in different things. The opening is lost.
Donkeys, Heraclitus says, would take a pile of sweepings over gold. Aristotle cites the line for the relativity of pleasure, and that is its surface: what counts as good depends on the nature doing the choosing. To the ass, chaff is wealth and gold is nothing to eat; the valuation is not wrong, only relative to a donkey's world.
It belongs to a set — pigs preferring mud to clean water (B13), the sea that is life to fish and death to men (B61) — in which Heraclitus keeps decentering the human estimate of worth. The sting is that gold is precisely the thing he uses elsewhere to figure real value: all things are an exchange for fire as goods are for gold (B90). So the donkey's error is not that it values, but that it values by its belly, seeing only <em>surma</em>, refuse, where another eye sees the standard of all exchange. The fragment quietly asks the reader which animal he is — and most men, Heraclitus thinks, are reaching for the chaff.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Heraclitus B9 in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Heraclitus — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Heraclitus B9 — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/heraclitus/B9/