Nature, Knowledge, and Practice
Read the full text in our reader
Socrates — εἰ μέν σοι ὑπάρχει φύσει ῥητορικῷ εἶναι, ἔσῃ ῥήτωρ ἐλλόγιμος, προσλαβὼν ἐπιστήμην τε καὶ μελέτην· ὅτου δʼ ἂν ἐλλείπῃς τούτων, ταύτῃ ἀτελὴς ἔσῃ.
If it is given you by nature to be a rhetorician, you will become a speaker of note — provided you add knowledge and practice; but in whatever of these you fall short, to that extent you will be incomplete.
Phaedrus asks the practical question at last: how does anyone actually acquire the art of speaking? Socrates answers with the classic recipe for mastery of any craft — and a warning about where real art lies.
This is the <em>locus classicus</em> of the oldest recipe for mastery in the Western tradition, and it names three ingredients that no craft can do without. To become a speaker of note you need <em>phýsis</em> — the inborn gift, what is simply 'there for you' (<em>hypárchei</em>) at the start; <em>epistḗmē</em> — the teachable science, real knowledge of the subject and the soul; and <em>melétē</em> — disciplined practice, the drilling that turns capacity into skill. And the three are strictly non-substitutable: fall short in any one (<em>elleípēis</em> — the verb behind 'ellipse'), and you are <em>atelḗs</em>, 'incomplete,' unfinished, never brought to your <em>télos</em>. Talent without training stays raw; knowledge without practice stays theoretical; drilling without gift or understanding stays mediocre. Isocrates built his rival school on exactly this triad, Cicero and Quintilian passed it to Rome, and every 'nature versus nurture' argument since is a footnote to it — with the crucial refinement that Plato adds a third term, practice, breaking the false binary: mastery is nature <em>and</em> knowledge <em>and</em> work.<br><br>But the sentence is set as a trap, and the next line springs it. Having granted that nature, knowledge, and practice make a distinguished orator, Socrates immediately adds that the real <em>art</em> (<em>téchnē</em>) 'does not lie along the road Lysias and Thrasymachus travel.' The rhetoricians have the practice and some of the knack; what they lack is the one kind of knowledge that matters — of the truth, and of the soul (271d). So the triad, true as far as it goes, is not yet enough: you could have inborn fluency, drill for years, and master every trick in the handbooks, and still be <em>atelḗs</em>, incomplete, because the <em>epistḗmē</em> you added was knowledge of tricks, not of things. This is the dialogue's steady insistence to the very end: skill divorced from truth is not a lesser art but a counterfeit of one. The complete speaker is not the most practiced but the one whose practice serves knowledge — which is to say, the philosopher.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Phaedrus 269d in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Phaedrus — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Phaedrus 269d — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/phaedrus/269d/