Memory or Reminding
Read the full text in our reader
Socrates — σύ, πατὴρ ὢν γραμμάτων, διʼ εὔνοιαν τοὐναντίον εἶπες ἢ δύναται. τοῦτο γὰρ τῶν μαθόντων λήθην μὲν ἐν ψυχαῖς παρέξει μνήμης ἀμελετησίᾳ, διὰ πίστιν γραφῆς ἔξωθεν ὑπʼ ἀλλοτρίων τύπων, οὐκ ἔνδοθεν αὐτοὺς ὑφʼ αὑτῶν ἀναμιμνῃσκομένους. οὔκουν μνήμης ἀλλὰ ὑπομνήσεως φάρμακον ηὗρες. σοφίας δὲ τοῖς μαθηταῖς δόξαν, οὐκ ἀλήθειαν πορίζεις
You, the father of letters, have out of fatherly fondness claimed for them the opposite of their true power. This invention will breed forgetting in the souls of those who learn it, through neglect of memory: trusting in writing, they will do their remembering from outside themselves, by alien marks — not from within, on their own. What you have discovered is a drug not for memory but for reminding. And to your students you offer the appearance of wisdom, not the reality: hearing much with no teaching, they will seem to know much, while mostly knowing nothing.
Theuth promises that letters will make Egyptians wiser and better at remembering. King Thamus's reply is the most famous verdict ever passed on a technology — by the god the Greeks called Ammon.
This is the most famous verdict ever passed on a communication technology, and it turns on a distinction English can barely hold: <em>mnḗmē</em>, memory alive in a soul, versus <em>hypómnēsis</em>, the external prompt — the note, the book, the stamp in wax. Thamus's other pairs lock the frame: writing works <em>éxōthen</em> (from outside) by 'alien <em>týpoi</em>' — stamps, the word that became 'type' and made the metaphor literal in Gutenberg — where real remembering is <em>éndothen</em>, self-moved from within, and delivers not <em>alḗtheia</em> but its counterfeit, <em>dóxa</em>, the seeming of wisdom. Note the word for what writing breeds: <em>lḗthē</em> — the underworld's own river of oblivion, and the buried half of <em>a-lḗtheia</em> itself. In Greek, the claim is almost a pun: the technology of preservation manufactures the very thing truth is the negation of.<br><br>And the drug is a <em>phármakon</em> — the double word (remedy AND poison) Theuth had offered as pure cure at 274e. Two ironies keep the passage honest. Thamus's critique of the doting inventor — 'you, its <em>father</em>, said the opposite of what it can do' — is an argument FOR judging technologies by someone other than their makers, as fresh now as then. And the whole attack on writing survives only because Plato <em>wrote it down</em> — a performative contradiction he knew and built in: at 276d writing is redeemed, but only as the philosopher's 'garden of letters,' play (<em>paidiá</em>) and reminder for the man who already knows — never a substitute for the word planted alive in a soul.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Phaedrus 275a in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Phaedrus — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Phaedrus 275a — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/phaedrus/275a/