Five Ways the Soul Wrongs Itself
Read the full text in our reader
Ὑβρίζει ἑαυτὴν ἡ τοῦ ἀνθρώπου ψυχὴ μάλιστα μέν, ὅταν ἀπόστημα καὶ οἷον φῦμα τοῦ κόσμου, ὅσον ἐφ̓ ἑαυτῇ, γένηται· τὸ γὰρ δυσχεραίνειν τινὶ τῶν γινομένων ἀπόστασίς ἐστι τῆς φύσεως, ἧς ἐν μέρει αἱ ἑκάστου τῶν λοιπῶν φύσεις περιέχονται. ἔπειτα δέ, ὅταν ἄνθρωπόν τινα ἀποστραφῇ ἢ καὶ ἐναντία φέρηται ὡς βλάψουσα, οἷαί εἰσιν αἱ τῶν ὀργιζομένων. τρίτον ὑβρίζει ἑαυτήν, ὅταν ἡσσᾶται ἡδονῆς ἢ πόνου. τέταρτον, ὅταν ὑποκρίνηται καὶ ἐπιπλάστως καὶ ἀναλήθως τι ποιῇ ἢ λέγῃ. πέμπτον, ὅταν πρᾶξίν τινα ἑαυτῆς καὶ ὁρμὴν ἐπ’ οὐδένα σκοπὸν ἀφιῇ, ἀλλ’ εἰκῇ καὶ ἀπαρακολουθήτως ὁτιοῦν ἐνεργῇ, δέον καὶ τὰ μικρότατα κατὰ τὴν ἐπὶ τὸ τέλος ἀναφορὰν γίνεσθαι· τέλος δὲ λογικῶν ζῴων τὸ ἕπεσθαι τῷ τῆς πόλεως καὶ πολιτείας τῆς πρεσβυτάτης λόγῳ καὶ θεσμῷ.
The human soul commits outrage against itself most of all when, so far as it can, it becomes an abscess and, as it were, a tumor on the universe — for to be vexed at anything that happens is a defection from nature, which holds within itself, as parts, the natures of everything else. Secondly, it does so when it turns away from another person, or even moves against him meaning to harm him, as the angry do. Thirdly, it commits outrage against itself when it is defeated by pleasure or by pain. Fourthly, when it play-acts, and does or says anything in a feigned and untruthful way. Fifthly, when it lets some act or impulse of its own move toward no goal at all, but does whatever it does at random and without thought — though even the smallest things ought to be done with reference to the end; and the end of rational beings is to follow the reason and law of that most venerable of cities and constitutions.
Marcus catalogs five distinct forms of self-inflicted hybris — resenting events, raging at a person, yielding to pleasure or pain, insincerity, and aimless action — and closes by naming the rational telos that all five betray: following the reason and law of the cosmic city.
Marcus opens with the most violent image in his moral vocabulary: the soul that resents what happens becomes an apostema, an abscess, a phyma, a tumor cut off from the living body of the kosmos. The metaphor is deliberately clinical — a soul in revolt against events is not merely wrong but diseased, self-severed from the physis whose parts everything, including one's own nature, is said to be contained in ("en merei"). The second failure, turning away from or raging at a person, is really the same refusal aimed at a human face instead of an event; Marcus elsewhere calls the man who provokes him a meddler (2.1) and insists such people are only doing what their own faulty nature requires of them.
The remaining three failures move from cosmic physics to personal discipline: losing to pleasure or pain, speaking or acting falsely, and — the one Marcus lingers over longest — letting an act or impulse (hormē) drift without reference to any skopos, any goal. That last clause is not a throwaway; it supplies the positive definition the whole list has been building toward. The telos of a logikon zōon, a reasoning creature, is to follow the logos and thesmos of "the most venerable city and constitution" — the Stoic cosmic polis that recurs at 4.4 and elsewhere in the Meditations. Aimlessness is the worst of the five precisely because it forfeits the one thing that makes a being a citizen of that city at all: acting for a reason.
Read the full commentary — and tap any word for its dictionary entry — in the interlinear reader.
Open Meditations 2.16 in the full reader
Always open passages in the reader
You are reading a page of the Meditations — the whole book is free in our interlinear reader.
The Great Library Project presses the classics in their original languages, glossed word by word — free to read, always. Browse the whole library.
Also on our shelves:
Meditations 2.16 — The Great Library Project interlinear edition · greatlibraryproject.com/book/meditations-greek/2.16/